 |
Site Updated
July 25th 2010
Toastmastering SInc.e April 1976
|
 |
Speech Evaluations by Lee Shuey
At Toastmasters' clubs all speeches, Table Topic responses, evaluations
and other toastmaster roles undertaken are subjected to an evaluation
by a fellow Toastmaster.
While there are many ways to conduct an
evaluation, at Glen Waverley Toastmasters' Club we prefer the Praise,
Improvement, Praise method of evaluating. (i.e. we open our evaluation
by acknowledging and praising the speaker's quality attributes, follow
up with only one or two areas where a suggested improvement would enhance
the speaker's performance and result in an improvement, then conclude
strongly with a summary of good points.) This provides all participants
with honest, supportive and constructive feedback in a friendly environment.
People who are serious about improving their speaking ability don’t
want a ‘whitewashed’ evaluation. They want constructive advice
or suggestions for improvement which can be addressed in their following
speeches, fostering progress in their speaking skills.
In real life most people are not prepared to give you an honest and constructive
appraisal of your performance. (e.g. ‘how did I go?’ ‘
Yeah, that was great.’ ) They don’t want to hurt your feelings.
In Toastmasters, even the most experienced speakers have areas where they
can improve. They expect and want to have these areas pointed out to them.
It’s easy to pick out the good points. The sign of an effective
evaluator is when you can deal sensitively with drawing attention to areas
in need of improvement. Always find at least ONE point for improvement
and never more than TWO.
Evaluation is also an effective tool in your working environment where
you are working as a team and are able to give each other constructive
feedback. Even if there is a list of ten areas for improvement, put forward
only one or two because you know that there will be future opportunities
for further suggestions.
Be constructive. Don’t demoralize. Don’t patronize.
Remember:
- An evaluation is a mini speech
- It is only one individual’s personal opinion
- Use the PIP sandwich method – Praise, Improvement, Praise
- Don’t whitewash
- Always present one or two points of improvement – give examples
if possible
- Leave the speaker feeling positive and looking forward to their next
speech
‘Positive
feedback is the breakfast of champions.’
Evaluation Summary
by Lee Shuey
| 1 |
Eye contact |
2 |
Hand gestures |
| 3 |
Body language / mannerisms |
4 |
Confidence |
| 5 |
Enthusiasm & vitality |
6 |
Vocal clarity |
| 7 |
Vocal pitch |
8 |
Vocal variety |
| 9 |
Humour |
10 |
Drama |
| 11 |
Content of speech |
12 |
Use of vocabulary |
| 13 |
Knowledge of subject |
14 |
Use of notes |
| 15 |
Use of lectern |
16 |
General movement |
| 17 |
Opening of speech |
18 |
Body of speech |
| 19 |
Conclusion of speech |
20 |
Pauses |
| 21 |
Rate of delivery |
22 |
‘Ums’ and ‘ahs’ |
| 23 |
Too much information |
24 |
Timing |
| 25 |
Control of nerves |
26 |
Impact on audience |
| 27 |
Appropriate amount of technical information |
28 |
Others |
Back to Top
|
 |